Registration is now closed.
The ETSU Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education is proud to invite you to the 4th Annual Coaches & Sport Science College on December 18-20, 2009!
Friday December 18th, 2009
7:30-8:00 am– Registration
8:00 – 8:15 – Welcome – Meg Stone and others (Dean, AD, VP, Pres. etc.)
8:15 – 8:50 – An Introduction to Periodization – a superior method of training – Mike Stone
8:50 – 10:50 – Periodization as applied to strength/power training – What are the real models and how well do they work (linear, non-linear, undulating, daily undulating ??) – Greg Haff
10:50 – 11:00 – Break
11:00 – 12:15 – Tapering : The ups and downs – Inigo Mujika|
12:15 – 1:15 – Lunch
1:15 – 2:30 – Boy, am I tired: Recovery and Restoration Methods, Which ones might work – Bill Sands
2:30 – 3:15—Sports Performance Enhancement Groups, Monitoring , Demonstrations/video – some easily performed field tests of strength, power and endurance. – Mike Ramsey
3:15– 3:45 – Conditioning for Games Players (warm-up, running, agility, flexibility, etc.) – Part 1- Protocol Rationale – Clive Brewer
3:45 – 4:00 – Break
4:00– 4:30 – Conditioning for Games Players (warm-up, running, agility, flexibility, etc.) – Part 2- Demonstration – practical application and keys to teaching good technique – Clive Brewer
4:30 – 5:30 – Landing mechanics, bounding, depth jumps and just plain jumping – Mike Favre
6:00– 8:00 – Banquet – Travis Triplett, Master of Ceremony – The ETSU Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education – Meg Stone (6:30 – 7:00)- So, you want to work with athletes – the ins and outs of working with elite athletes. – Inigo Mujika (7 – 7:30)
Saturday December 19th, 2009
7:45– 8:15 – Registration
8:15 – 8:30 – Welcome – Meg Stone et al.
8:30 – 9:30 – Weight-room management and organization – conflict resolution, scheduling and more – Mike Gentry
9:30 –11:00– Machines and Free weights – what is the difference? – Greg Haff
11:00 – 11:15 – Break
11:15 – 12:30 – Everything you wanted to know about the squat(s) and deadlift(s): Demonstration/video- practical application and keys to teaching good technique – Dan Wathen
12:30 – 1:30 – Lunch
1:30 – 2:45 – Everything you wanted to know about weightlifting movements: Demonstration/video- practical application and keys to teaching good technique – Mike Stone
2:45 – 3:45 – Oh say can you see? – Vision and vision training for athletes – Jeff Falkel
3:45 – 4:00 –Break
4:00- 5:15 – Coach, how much weight should I lift? – How to set the load, (Failure/RM’s, heavy and light, daily, weekly etc.) : Importance of calculating volume load and intensity etc. – Mike Stone and Greg Haff
5:15 – 6:15 – Round Table – All
Meg Stone – Two–time Olympian and distinguished strength and conditioning coach. Director of the Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education.
Dr. Mike Stone – Director of the Exercise and Sport Sciences Laboratory at ETSU. Previous Head of Physiology for the USOC.
Dr. Greg Haff – Assistant Professor in Exercise Physiology at West Virginia University School of Medicine.
Dr. Inigo Mujika- Outstanding and highly recognized Sport Scientist/physiologist and coach at the Araba Sports Clinic in the Basque country, Spain.
Dr. Bill Sands – Formerly the Head of Biomechanics and Director of the Recovery Center for the United State Olympic Committee. Now Head of the Sport Performance Lab at Mesa State University in Colorado.
Dr. Mike Ramsey – Associate Professor at ETSU, emphasis in Cardiovascular Physiology.
Clive Brewer – Head of Human Performance for English Rugby League and the contracted strength and conditioning specialist at Wimbledon Tennis Championships.
Mike Favre – Formerly the Strength and Conditioning Coach for the United States Olympic Committee, now the Head Strength and Conditioning Coach of Olympic Sports at the University of Michigan.
Mike Gentry – Well-recognized Strength and Conditioning Coach, Head of Olympic Sports at Virginia Tech.
Dan Wathen – Former Head Athletic Trainer and Strength and Conditioning Coordinator at Youngstown State University.
Dr. Jeff Falkel – Well-respected Physical Therapist and Strength and Conditioning Coach with his area of expertise in vision training.
Human Kinetics will be available to discuss their publishing program with any attendees interested.
For More Information about the UKSCA and the Accredited Strength & Conditioning Coach Process please visit www.uksca.org.uk.
Why become an Accredited Strength & Conditioning Coach?
Becoming an Accredited Strength & Conditioning Coach (ASCC) with the UK Strength & Conditioning Association involves a competency-based assessment, and only those coaches who can prove they are knowledgeable in both training theory and practical coaching skills can become accredited. It is for this reason that this professional standard is fast becoming valued around the world.
In recognition of this, a number of key US coaches across a variety of sports have travelled to the UK in the last several years to attend an assessment day and become accredited.
Second Ever Assessment Day in the United States
We are pleased to announce that for the second time, an assessment day will be hosted in the US (Johnson City, TN) on December 20, 2009, offering the opportunity for a limited number of coaches to gain this highly respected accreditation.
Aims of the UKSCA
How to Apply
Those interested in applying for the December 20, 2009 assessment day should:
What occurs on the Assessment Day
The assessment day is divided into four parts:
Assessment Fees
Candidates will be charged $375 for the assessment process. This includes the first year’s membership in the UKSCA as an accredited member.
The Center for Excellence in Sports Science and Coach Education (CESSCE) will be hosting posters for its fourth annual Coaches College. The subject matter must deal directly or indirectly with the enhancement of competitive athletes. Posters can deal with advances in coaching, coaching methods, biomechanical, psychological, physiological or sports medicine aspects.
Posters will be accepted on the basis of study summaries submitted by e-mail. The deadline for acceptance is November 15th 2009 (no exceptions). Summaries should be concise, and contain sections dealing with: purpose/introduction, methods, results and discussion Summaries should be limited to 2-3 pages (12 pt font). An example is provided below. Incomplete studies without data will not be accepted. The summaries will be published here at sportscienceed.com.
Awards will be given in the following categories
Coaching/Coach Education
1st place – $150
2nd place – $75
Sports Science
1st place – $150
2nd place – $75
Outstanding student Poster- $150
Posters must be up by Friday morning at December 18th at 8:00 am – judging will take place during all breaks – primary authors are expected to stand with their posters during all breaks.
Posters should fit a standard size display: approximately 4 ft x 4 ft. (122 cm x 122 cm)
Judges for the competition
Coaches Education
Sports Science
Example
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISOMETRIC FORCE CHARACTERISTICS AND THE DIFFERENCE IN UN-WEIGHTED AND WEIGHTED VERTICAL JUMP HEIGHT
Jenna M. Kraska, Michael W. Ramsey, G. Gregory Haff, Nate Fethke, Ann M. Kinser, William A. Sands, Keith Painter, Margaret E. Stone and Michael H. Stone
Sports Performance Enhancement Consortium
East Tennessee State University
Johnson City, TN, USA, 37614
Introduction: Weighted and unweighted jumps may provide insights into both mechanistic and practical aspects of explosive performance. So, for strength and conditioning professionals, the monitoring of vertical jump height and jump height responses under various loading conditions is easy to perform and may be a practical assessment tool that is specific to the characteristics observed in sport. Therefore, the purpose of the current investigation was to examine the relationships between isometric force time-curve characteristics and markers of unloaded and loaded vertical jump performance. A primary purpose was to examine the relationships of maximal strength to these characteristics.
Methods: Forty-one female and twenty-two male USA Collegiate Division I athletes (n = 63) active in track and field, tennis, softball, soccer, and volleyball participated in the study. Athletes read and signed written informed consent documents pertaining to the long-term athlete monitoring program and all testing procedures in accordance with the guidelines of East Tennessee State University’s Institutional Review Board.
Athlete height was measured using a stadiometer and recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body mass was determined using an electronic scale and body composition was determined with, air displacement plethsmography (BodPod, Life Measurement Incorporated, Concord, CA). Vertical jump height was derived from flight time using a force plate. Maximum strength characteristics were measured by an isometric mid-thigh pull. Isometric peak force (IPF), force at 50, 90 250 ms and rate of force development (IRFD) were measured by force-time curve analyses using customized signal processing software (LabView, National Instruments, Austin, TX). Reliabilities for these measures were excellent (ICCα ≥ 0.88 – 0.99)
Relationships between variables were assessed using a Pearson correlation procedure. Additionally a subgroup (n = 6) of the strongest five percent of males and females (3 males + 3 females) were compared to a subgroup (n = 6) of the weakest five percent males and females (3 males + 3 females). Athletes were placed into weak or strong groups according to their allometrically scaled isometric peak force values (IPFa). Independent samples t-Tests were used to assess differences between means (strong group IPFa = 232.4 ± 28.4 N/kg 0.67, weak IPFa = 123.18 ± 18.87 N/kg 0.67, (p ≤ 0.05). Due to the large number of pair-wise comparisons between groups, the Holm’s Sequential Bonferroni method was used to control for type I errors. Cohen’s effect sizes (d) were also calculated. The experimental design is shown in Figure 1:
Results: Athletes (n = 63) were 19.9 ± 1.3 yrs.; 172.8 ± 7.7 cm in height and their body mass was 72.9 ±19.6 kg. There was a very strong correlation between IPF and IRFD (r = 0.88, p ≤ 0.05) agreeing with previous literature (1, 2). IPF showed moderate to strong correlations with F50 (r = 0.85), F90 (r = 0.42) and F250 (r = 0.93). Correlations of IPF and percent decrements in jump height ranged from moderate to strong negative correlations indicating stronger athletes lost less height. Compared to weak athletes, strong athletes had greater values for all force measures and for IRFD (p < 0.5). Differences between strong and weak groups showed that stronger athletes jumped higher (SJ 0kg = 30.8 ± 9.7 vs 23.7 ± 4.9 cm, p ≤ 0.5, d = 0.92; CMJ 0 kg = 33.5 ± 10.8 vs 28.3 ± 6.3 p ≤ 0.05, d = 0.60; SJ 20 kg = 25.4 ± 8.3 vs 16.7± 4.8 cm, p ≤ 0.05, d = 1.28; CMJ 20kg = 27.6 ± 8.6 vs 18.7 ± 5.3, p ≤, d = 1.24). The strong group had smaller decrements (SJ = 17.8 ± 3.4 vs30.4 ± 7.8 %, p ≤ 0.5, d = 2.10; CMJ =17.4 % ± 4.8 vs 34.5 ± 7.8 %, p < 0.05, d = 2.65).
Discussion: Three important findings were associated with the current investigation: First, strong relationships were observed between maximum strength (IPF), IRFD and F50, F90, F250. It is unclear exactly why increased maximum strength is associated with increased RFD, but it may be related to alterations in the H-reflex. Second was the association of maximum strength characteristics (e.g. IPF, IRFD) with jump capabilities. Additionally, assuming that the isometric measures are indicative of striking, sprinting and jumping (i.e. force at 50, 90, and 250 ms) then stronger athletes measured in this manner can produce superior results in these activities. The third important finding was the observation that stronger athletes have smaller decrements in vertical jump heights associated with weighted jumps compared to weaker athletes. There are several potential underlying reasons for these observations. Training studies have shown increases in neural drive (IRFD) associated adaptations in contractile strength of skeletal muscle (2). Furthermore, athletes that are found to be more explosive, which may be strongly related to their nervous system capabilities, are often found to possess high levels of strength. Thus maximum strength appears to be an important underlying mechanism that influences both un-weighted and weighted jumping and by extrapolation, explosive exercises.
References:
1. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, Dyhre-Poulsen P. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol 2002 October: 93(4):1318-26.
2.. Stone MH, Sanborn K, O’Bryant HS et al. Maximum strength-power-performance relationships in collegiate throwers. J Strength Cond Res 2003 November: 17(4):739-45.
Conference Location
Millenium Center – www.millctr.com
Airports
Tri-Cities Airport (20-minute drive)
McGhee-Tyson Airport (Knoxville, TN 2-hour drive)
Asheville Regional Airport (Asheville, NC 1-hour drive).
Nearby Hotels
Carnegie Hotel: www.carnegiehotel.com
Phone: (423) 979-6400 (Mention ETSU Coaches College)
Sleep Inn: Phone (423)915-0081
Hampton Inn: Phone (423)-929-8000
For other area information and list of hotels, please email Liz Schoen: Schoen@etsu.edu.
I am now 60 (and a little more) years old. For the last few years, by telephone, e-mail, conferences, symposia etc., I have been asked to write a few thoughts about what things I think I have learned about training, strength, power endurance, etc. – so, here are a few thoughts.
I have been involved, either directly or indirectly, in sport science for over forty years. During that time there have been ups and downs but most of the time it has been rewarding and even pleasurable. I have had the opportunity to work with some of the best colleague’s and students that anyone could ask for; indeed, they have made me look good. So, it is with/through these colleagues and current students that I share these few thoughts. I would be remiss if I did not mention a few of these colleagues and friends that I have known for many years, that I still work with and who have made a substantial impact on my life and on sports science. As with anyone, there are people (beyond your family) who have some influence on your life and you will not forget that, however, these few people that I write about are those that, helped me to conceptualize what and why I believe what I do about the world, especially the world of sport science and made me think much deeper than I would have otherwise. Anyone who reads this should realize that these are truly gifted, special people who will continue to impact not only my life, but many, many others.
Older Folks (I’ve known them longer)
First is Meg Stone MS, my wife and best friend. Meg, born in Kirkcaldy, Scotland, was a multi-time all American thrower at the University of Arizona. She was the 1983 Commonwealth Games Gold Medal winner in the discus, and a two time Olympian for Great Britain (1980, 1984). Meg (Ritchie) was the first women to be a Head Strength and Conditioning Coach at a D-1 University or any other level (U of Arizona 1983 – 1994 and later Texas Tech 1994-1996); she was one of the first three women selected as Fellows of the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) and the first women to be awarded an NSCA Life-time Achievement Award (2009). She was the first women to be a Head National Athletics Coach (track and field) in Great Britain or Europe (Scotland 1999-2002). She has coached several national and international level athletes in both track and field and weightlifting. Meg has been interested in sport science and coach education for many years and has had a dream and set herself a goal of creating a true performance based coach education program in an academic setting. This dream is coming true at ETSU. Currently, she is the Director of the East Tennessee State University Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education (CESSCE). Even with her busy schedule, she still finds time to get involved directly with sports science research and especially coaches education. Meg really makes me look good and has taught me a lot about the practicalities of teaching, coaching and dealing with people.
I met Travis Triplett PhD in 1988; she was one of my graduate students at Appalachian State University. One of the things learned early in my career is that one good way of beginning to separate those who can from those who cannot is to challenge them very directly. This is easily accomplished by telling someone “they cannot do something, they are wrong, or implying they are too dumb to figure something out”, then observing, carefully, their reaction, both immediate and long-term. Although this can really upset some people, most of the time, those worth knowing and dealing with, rise to the challenge. Trying this with Travis, I soon learned that she was resilient, absolutely knew what she was doing and who she was, and even better, she was a lot smarter than me (and still is). After her master’s degree she spent a year as an intern at the USOC, went on to finish a PhD at Penn State and then a Post Doc at Southern Cross University in Australia. Travis was the first women to be selected as a Fellow of the NSCA and as of February 2009, is still one of only three. Travis is currently back at ASU and is one of the leading researchers in the areas of resistance training and the elderly, and resistance training and osteoporosis, and still finds time to do some sport science. Travis collaborates with the CESSCE on a regular basis, which helps to keep us straight.
Harold O’Bryant PhD, a former assistant collegiate gymnastics coach at Appalachian State University and head Men’s coach at Jacksonville Sate University, received his PhD at LSU, some years back. I was lucky enough to be on his doctoral committee, even though I had graduated from FSU only a year before. It was obvious that Harold was a special person from the onset. His dissertation is quite unique – to my knowledge it was the first research performed in the United States (carried out in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s) with resistance training and periodization as the focus. His research was far far ahead of its time. Today, it is still one of the best sources of information dealing with periodization and resistance training that exists. Everyone, interested in this area should take the time and effort necessary to find and to read this document. Experiments were carried out on males, females, non-athletes and athletes. The studies dealt with various forms of periodization and their comparison to other methods of resistance training. Not all of the manuscript has been published (yet). Harold can make any device work, create new devices when necessary, repair almost anything, and has probably saved his department a few hundred thousand dollars as result. Harold is a full Professor, Director of the Biomechanics Laboratory and Exercise Science Program Director (not to mention having been graduate coordinator, teacher, Master’s thesis director, committee member, etc. since 1982). Harold is currently part of the Department of Health, Leisure and Exercise Science at Appalachian State University, where he is greatly under paid and under appreciated. Harold is still active in research, especially as it concerns the conditioning aspects of gymnastics, recovery and vibration and is currently collaborating in several projects with the CESSCE.
I have known Kyle Pierce EdD, for about 35 years as a student, athlete, colleague and friend. Kyle is without a doubt the leading weightlifting coach in the United States. Kyle was my doctoral student beginning at LSU and finishing up at Auburn. Kyle is currently an Associate Professor of Health Science and Director of the USAW Developmental Center at LSU-Shreveport (which exist almost solely as a result of Kyle’s efforts). He has been quite active in both the USAW and IWF, consistently giving much more than he gets back. One of the unique aspects about Kyle is that he is a very good scientist, being actively engaged in research and is also an outstanding coach and teacher. As you might expect Kyle’s research interests’ center around strength, especially as it relates to weightlifting and particularly as it relates to children and adolescents. He is also an excellent strength and conditioning coach and regularly trains a host of athletes besides the weightlifters. As one might expect, Kyle is in great demand as a speaker at both scientific and coaches’ meetings around the world (e.g. IWF meetings, NSCA, UKSCA). Kyle’s approach to weightlifting and weight training is also unique in that he, unlike most coaches, actually applies what he learns from sport science to his coaching endeavor and has not followed the typical “let’s copy the Bulgarian’s, Greek’s or Russian’s” training programs which has been so prevalent among weightlifting and strength coaches in this country. Instead, Kyle has relied on good research, logical inferences from research as well as his experience and is producing, consistently, the best weightlifters in the USA, including the number one male weightlifter and 2008 Olympian, Kendrick Farris. In this context he recently received the Doc Councilman award from the USOC. This award goes to the coach (international level) who best integrates science and coaching. Kyle is regular speaker at our symposia (at least when he is in the country) and is involved with our research efforts, particularly when it involves weightlifting.
John Garhammer PhD, was the first scientist I was ever around who had a real interest in weightlifting and strength as something more then a passing curiosity or something to be made fun of. I first met John in 1978 at the Common Wealth Games Sports Science meeting in Edmonton, Canada, although we had been corresponding for about a year before that. We were both doctoral students in 1977 and John contacted me about a paper I wrote for International Olympic Lifter. He was the reviewer for that journal and I think he was astounded that there was anyone else, in academics, interested in weightlifting. We continued to keep in contact, by phone occasionally, letters (this was before e-mail – not sure how we did it -rather primitive) and also seeing each other at weightlifting meets/clinics or scientific meetings. Beginning in October 1979, we worked together at Auburn University for a few years at the National Strength Research Center (a good idea that never really got off the ground), both of us left, John before me and went on to other things. During the early 80’s we worked together on the USOC/USAW weightlifting elite athlete project, one of the first scientific studies on weightlifting or weightlifters to be carried out in the USA. We continued to keep in touch and collaborate on various projects, particularly weightlifting projects. John, likely has done more on the biomechanics of weightlifting then anyone anywhere. Although, semi-retired, John continues to present and write about a number of strength and conditioning topics, especially his about first love, weightlifting.
I have known Dan Wathen since the early 1980’s; we met at one of the first few NSCA meetings and like a lot of things, I can’t remember which one. Dan was the Head Athletic Trainer and Strength and Conditioning Supervisor at Youngstown State University for many years. He was also a national and international level powerlifter. He recently retired from YSU (2008) but from what I understand, will not go away. Dan knows more trivia and general facts then anyone I know, luckily for us this includes knowing a whole lot about sport medicine and sport science. Furthermore, he keeps up (better than anyone) with current powerlifting, weightlifting and strongman competition. There is almost no area of strength and conditioning that Dan has not read about and more importantly, thought about and presented or written about. As a result he is in great demand as a speaker at both national and international meetings; indeed when I was at Edinburgh University in Scotland and we ( Primarily Dougie Bryce) were developing what became the United Kingdom Strength and Conditioning Association the first invited speaker we asked to address the association was Dan Wathen. Indeed, when I (and my colleagues at the CESSCE) get an idea about trying out new some aspect of sport science research or testing athletes, Dan is one of the first people I call. He is also a NSCA Past President and (among many awards) a Life-Time Achievement Award recipient. One of Dan’s strength’ (one of many) is that he always tries to see both sides of a question (political, scientific and otherwise) and consequently is often more objective about an issue than most of us. Dan regularly contributes to our (CESSCE) symposia and hopefully will continue to do so for years to come.
Bill Sands PhD is without a doubt the best “sports scientist” I know. I have known him for about 20 years and my respect for him and what he does grows every day. I was lucky enough to work directly with Bill at the USOC for several years where he is now the Head of the Recovery Center. Bill was a gymnastics coach in the early part of career, producing and/or working with many national and international level men’s and women’s gymnasts, including several Olympians. Wanting to become a better coach is a large part of what “drove” Bill toward sport science; in fact many of the tools developed by Bill in his early career (as a coach) are still cutting edge sports science today; such as a computer based athlete monitoring system. Characteristic of a good scientist, Bill has developed a broad scope of knowledge that is far beyond the norm; having expertise in psychology, biomechanics/engineering, physiology and more. Like Harold O’Bryant, Bill can make anything work that is broken, and build just about any device that is worth building. Thus, it is no wonder that he wears so many hats at the USOC (biomechanics’, physiologist etc.). Although, I worked as sport scientists for many years before working directly with Bill, he really made me (and others) aware of the “conceptual nature” of sport science, the profound impact of sports science and its international scope. Fortunately, he continues to work with the CESSCE.
I met Larry Meadors PhD at an NSCA conference about 12 years ago and it was a good day for sure. Larry is one of the true pioneers in strength and conditioning, extolling the virtues of strength and conditioning way before it became popular or routine. Retired now (sort of); Larry was a high school coach in the Burnsville school district in Minneapolis for nearly 40 years. Presently, he spends much of his time coaching everyone from beginners to professional athletes, particularly dealing with ice hockey athletes (as well as training members of the Minneapolis SWAT team). Larry has developed a number of excellent programs for junior high school, high school and beyond. One program, in particular, that is outstanding is a method of teaching/training weightlifting movements when dealing with beginners. Larry is very thoughtful, dedicated and hardworking; this truly makes a difference when working to create good programs for committed athletes. He is a long-time strong supporter of sports science; he has been a supporter of the CESSCE from the beginning – regularly makes contributions and we are fortunate to have him as a colleague.
In any academic or practical endeavor, especially one dealing with an area that is not typical of a university system or which does not typically bring in large grants and contracts, such as sport science, life can be harder than normal. This is especially true if you are determined to excel in that area. So, it is imperative that those involved are strongly and wholly committed to reaching beyond the norm, establishing high standards and have a tough hide. Furthermore, more than other faculty or staff, they have to pull together and often have to work twice as hard to reach their goals. Mike Ramsey PhD, came to ETSU at the same time I did (2005). Mike came to ETSU right out of Texas A&M where he attained an excellent background in basic and applied science. Although not trained as a sport scientist (almost no-one is in the USA), he knew this is what he wanted to be when he grew up; there is no doubt he is grown. While both of us struggled with the high teaching loads, service loads and the typical university red-tape, we also worked hard at establishing good relations with the athletic department, re-orienting our students to a more scientific-research based approach to academics, ramping-up the research efforts of our laboratory and we started upgrading the “visibility” and role of sports science in the curriculum. No-one could ask for a better colleague and good friend then Mike Ramsey. Indeed I am quite proud to say that Mike is a friend and colleague as he is not only becoming a good teacher and sport scientists, but he is quite simply a good man. Mike has taken a leading role in the establishment of the athlete monitoring program (Sport, Performance Enhancement Consortium- SPEC) which is a co-operative effort with the ETSU Intercollegiate Athletic Department and the CESSCE. In fact neither would exist without Mike’s efforts.
I first met Jay T. Kearney PhD in the early – mid 1980’s when he was the chair of the Department at the University of Kentucky. Jay T. was an elite athlete and an Olympian (Canoe). This really surprised me as I had previously thought of Canoe/Kayak folks as being on the small side – Jay T. is not, nor is there anything small in his life including his intellect. He is obviously knowledgeable about the science of canoe/kayak training and competition and, like all good scientists has a broad knowledge and interest in a number of areas, especially as it concerns endurance training. Currently, Jay T. is the Head of the “Endurance Sportfolio” at the USOC. Knowing Jay T. influenced my life – perhaps more than he knows – it was relatively early in my carrier when we first met and I was still deciding exactly what I was going to be; shortly after we met, he became the Head of Sport Science at the USOC. Jay T. is a highly respected scientist and administrator and he has a unique approach to sport science that is often missing among many (perhaps most) sport scientists. Generally, sport science, especially strength and conditioning is not appreciated in academic settings for a number of reasons. Indeed some administrators and “basic” scientists look down upon sport science as “lacking merit” partly because you see very little sports science in “high impact journals” (more on this later) and you cannot get NIH funding etc. to study sport. Jay T. has as much passion and zeal to assist coaches and athletes as anyone I know but he was also the first person (and first scientist) that I know to approach sport science as a true intellectual pursuit, worthy of a place in the academic community (or any other community). This made a deep and lasting impression on me and colors much of what I am to this day. Additionally, Jay T. has helped me to understand the “politics” of sport (and of academics), a factor(s) that never ceases to amaze me. We have collaborated on several research and educational projects through the years and I value his opinion very much. He has never steered me wrong on any issue.
Andy Fry PhD, is the Head of the Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Science at the University of Kansas. I met Andy in 1990 while we were carrying out an experiment on supplements for USA Weightlifting. I had gotten a USOC grant for this study and was working with Jay T. Kearney; Andy was one of Bill Kraemer’s (at PSU) doctoral students at the time and Bill sent him to help out. Andy had come back to school after working for a few years and it was immediately apparent to me that (after my usual verbal assaults) that he was worth knowing. After graduating from Penn State, he took a job as a muscle physiologist at the University of Memphis. He stayed at the University of Memphis for several years and worked with Brian Schilling as a student and later as a faculty member. Andy was the head of the laboratory while he was at Memphis and together with Brian Schilling, Larry Weiss and their students turned out some pretty good sport science research even though that was not their primary task in their department. Although, not directly sports science, Andy is turning out a good deal of exercise and basic science that helps to underpin much of what goes on in sport science.
I first met Dave Collins PhD in March 1999. I could tell right away that he was different. Not only was he the new Head of the Department of Physical Education, Leisure and Sport Sciences at Edinburgh University in Scotland, but had been in the Special Services (somewhat similar to the Navy SEALS and Marine Recon Companies). He left Edinburgh University to become the High Performance Director for British Athletics for several years (a thankless job at best), including the period during the last (2008) Olympics, during which GB performed quite well in athletics (Track and Field). Furthermore, he is a Sport Psychologists. Dave is very bright, one of the most emotionally intense people I have ever met, and works very, very hard to be the best at what ever he does. There is almost no job that that he cannot do and do well. One of the things that I learned from Dave is, never, never give up. We still stay in touch and consult with each other on a regular basis about a variety of topics dealing with sport science and sport.
I met Dougie Bryce MS when I was Professor and Chair of Sport at Edinburgh University in Scotland. Dougie worked for SportScotland. Part of Dougie’s job was to develop and provide coaches education, a task that he took (and still does) very seriously. Dougie talked me into teaching a “certification” course in sport science/strength and conditioning for a group of coaches at a primary training center, Grangemouth, Scotland early in 2000. Three major things came out of this first course; 1) this created the initial nucleus of strength and conditioning coaches in Scotland and 2) this course developed into a regular certification course that was taught twice per year at Largs, Scotland (another training center), many coaches and potential sport scientists took this course and expanded the number of “certified” S & C coaches in Scotland. 3) Perhaps the most important development from these courses – thanks to Dougie Byrce – was the addition of a symposium along with the course that began to attract large numbers (150+) coaches and sports scientists from all over the world. – It was this symposium that developed and grew towards a Scottish strength and conditioning association that then developed into the UK Strength and Conditioning Association (UKSCA) which now has several thousand members and currently has the most comprehensive certification program going. Dougie Bryce was the person behind this, made it happen with few resources and deserves the credit for this major development in the world of strength and conditioning. Dougie, is currently the Executive Director of Scottish Judo and they are lucky to have him. Perhaps more than anyone, Dougie showed me what can be if you are diligent and work at it.
Ron Byrd PhD, is a professor of exercise science at LSU-Shreveport. He was my doctoral major professor at Florida State University back in the mid 1970’s. He also was Harold O’Bryant’s major professor at LSU during the early 1980’s and now works with Kyle Pierce at LSU-S. He has been a Department Head and Dean and was a Fullbright Scholar; he publishes in a wide range of journals from exercise science and ergonomics to sport science to sport history. Although, trained as an exercise environmental physiologist, Dr. Byrd has kept up a steady stream of sport science and related research for more than 50 years. Both by class-room teaching and more importantly by example, Dr. Byrd taught me (and a lot of other people) that having a broad knowledge of the area was extremely important if you really wanted to become a good scientist, teacher or coach. He also taught me that one study does not make truth and was never enough. As much as anyone Dr. Byrd instilled in me the basic tenant of science – as search for truth. He is still active in as a teacher, researcher and scholar.
Younger Folks
Clive Brewer MS currently works for SportScotland, the Scottish equivalent of the USOC. I met Clive in about 2000 at one of the early UKSCA formative meetings in Scotland. I had known his wife Linda (also working for SportScotland) for about 2 years before I met Clive. Together they make a formidable sport/sport science team. Clive knows more about the ins and outs of athlete development than anyone I know. He is well versed on the physiology/biomechanics of sport performance as well as the administrative/financial aspects of athlete development. Clive also has a superior knowledge of training principles, especially as it concerns strength and conditioning. He is a prolific writer and his (along with Mike Favre from the USOC) papers on the technique and uses of weightlifting movements are as good as any available. Another paper (co-authored with Kyle Pierce, Bill Sands and myself) that is especially pertinent to today’s climate of strength and conditioning and will form the backbone of the UKSCA position stand on resistance training for children and adolescents. He has written several excellent textbooks dealing with strength and conditioning for team and individual sports; and if these are not in your library, they should be. Clive is a good person, enthusiastic, emotionally intense and always gives far more than he receives back; as with others on this list – he is under appreciated and SportScotland do not know what they have. Clive is a regular, much in demand and much appreciated contributor to our CESSCE symposia and clinics.
Greg Haff PhD was a master’s student at Appalachian State in the mid 1990’s. It was quite apparent to me, even then, that he would have a bright future and become a leading sport scientist. He went on to get his doctorate at the University of Kansas and was without a doubt one of their better students. Currently, Greg is on the faculty of the Exercise Physiology Department in the Medical School at West Virginia University. I also coached Greg as a weightlifter; he reached national level, and I believe that this experience as a high level athlete helped him to understand how a scientific approach could benefit an athlete. Furthermore, from a very practical hands-on experience, how “science”could be integrated into a sport training process. This experience likely helped him to move, away from the dark side, toward sports science and coaching. Greg’s background in academics, his experiences as a high level athlete and later his coaching work has given him insights that are unlikely to be attained through academic pathways alone. Greg is presently, without a doubt, one of the leaders in strength and conditioning both nationally and internationally, particularly as it concerns the training process. He is currently on the BOD of the NSCA and has recently become involved/accredited with the UKSCA. Although living and working in Morgantown, WV, Greg collaborates, almost daily, with the CESSCE. We stay in touch by e-mail, phone and occasional visits. He has served (and continues to) on several graduate thesis committee’s at ETSU and we regularly collaborate on research projects (both at ETSU and WVU); he is a valuable contributor to our symposia and clinics.
Brian Schilling PhD, came to Appalachian State University in 1997 as master’s student. I was Brian’s major professor and also helped him with his weightlifting; he became a national level lifter and as with other athlete/students I am sure this helped to drive his interest in sport science. Brian has had an interest in sports science from the beginning, his thesis dealt with the effects of creatine supplementation on athletes, which was really cutting edge and a hot topic in the mid-late 1990’s. Brian went on to get his PhD in biology with a specialization in physiology at the University of Memphis, where he is now on the faculty and the Head of their Neuro-Mechanics Laboratory. Brian has continued his interest in nutrition/supplementation and biomechanics, married a RD (Leslie Schilling) and together they are making a strong contribution to the sport nutrition area. Brian’s primary research deals with resistance training and Parkinson’s disease but still finds time to study, present and write about various topics in sports science, especially strength training. Indeed, some of Brian’s work on explosive exercise and specificity is as good as it gets. We still collaborate on various items and Brian has been a valued regular contributor to the CESSCE symposia and clinics for the past year(s) and hopefully will continue to do so for years to come.
I have always admired true iconoclasts (there are lots of fake ones around). True iconoclasts regularly tear down idols and poke holes in windmills (and windbags) and never, never boast about it. I first met Steve Plisk MS at an NSCA meeting about 15 years ago and I am very glad I did. Steve is one of the best strength and conditioning coaches that I know. He has knowledge of training practices and principles next to none. We have worked together on several projects including several published review papers. These have included two reviews which I believe are quite good and worth the read; one deals with training modes and methods (Stone, M.H., Plisk, S. and Collins, D. Training Principles: evaluation of modes and methods of resistance training – a coaching perspective, Sport Biomechanics 1: 79-104, 2002) and the other is what I believe is an important paper dealing with periodization and training principles. (Plisk S. and Stone M.H. Periodization Strategies, Strength and Conditioning 25:19-37, 2003). Steve has some very unique and thought provoking insights into the world of strength and conditioning (and life in general) of which everyone should take note. Steve is currently a regular contributor to the CESSCE clinics/symposia and we are lucky to have him as a participant.
Jeff McBride PhD, is an Associate Professor of Biomechanics at Appalachian State University. I was the outside reader for his dissertation, which was completed at Southern Cross University in Lismore, Australia. Jeff went on to do a Post-Doc with P. Komi in Finland. Jeff is probably the youngest of this group; was educated abroad and so has a little different (and refreshing) way of looking at some of the same problems the rest of us have been struggling with for years. Although Jeff and his students/colleagues don’t always work directly with athletes (who does), most of his research is largely related either directly or indirectly to improving sport performance. In my opinion Jeff is probably the leader right now in innovative biomechanical research dealing with strength training. If you have not attended one of his presentations (bring a calculator) or read his papers, you should. Jeff is active with the CESSCE both in research endeavors and is a regular contributor to our clinics and symposia.
I hope that anyone reading this, who is really interested in sport science, coaching and coach education, will take the time to get to know something about these people. You may never actually meet them, however, go to their presentations, listen to them and read their works. Rarely, in a person’s lifetime will you meet more than two or three special people. I am very, very lucky in that I have worked with all of them and have gotten to know these people, know their capabilities, know what is in their hearts and can say again, without reservation – they are special, gifted far beyond most and I am lucky to have them as colleagues and more importantly as a friend.
Many of the people I written about (above) were my students – I would be quite remiss if I did not say a few words about the students I have been fortunate enough to be associated with over the years. While there are always a few that you would like to forget, on the whole I remember all of my students – they have helped immensely. We have a unique situation here at ETSU and we have an especially good and knowledgeable group of students; there is no doubt in my mind that many of them will go far in the world of sport science or anything else they chose. I would be equally remiss if I did n not mention the athlete’s that I have coached over the years. They have included athletes in a number of sports from baseball to track and field, from developmental athletes, including juniors, to Olympians and have included athletes from several different countries. Most have been weightlifters and throwers. I remember them all and learned a great deal from my coaching experience. Indeed, I believe that all sport scientists should both compete and coach at some point in their career (or a least try to) as the insights gained into the problems facing coaches and athletes are invaluable. Although I have not named these students and athletes here, I am sure that I will be writing about many of them in the near future. I can truly say that without these people I would not be where I am today, would not be able to pursue sport science research and would not know most of what I know about sport, sport science and especially strength and conditioning.
MICHAEL H. STONE PHD,
FELUKSCA, ASCC, FNSCA
CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR SPORT SCIENCE AND
COACH EDUCATION (CESSCE)
The 3rd Annual ETSU Center of Excellence in Sport Science and Coach Education Coaches College was held in Johnson City on December 13th and 14th. Three years ago the conference started with 35 attendees. This year the College was attended by 150 coaches, sport scientists and members of the medical profession. The Coaches College continues to grow in numbers. Based on the evaluations, the College is addressing major concerns and issues facing the profession of sport science and coaching. The final practical session on program planning was particularly well received, so much so that many requests have been received to repeat the session at next year’s College. The Center looks forward to including this workshop in next years program. The Coaches College will be held December 18th and 19th 2009. Please keep these dates in mind as schedules are arranged for 2009.